工口影院

Article

The complexity of stigma demands nuanced debate

Details

Citation

Morris J & Nicholls J (2025) The complexity of stigma demands nuanced debate. Addiction Research & Theory. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2025.2509632

Abstract
First paragraph: Morris et al. (Citation2024) respond to recent claims that societal disapproval may help reduce ‘substance use and addiction’ (SUA) (Vanyukov Citation2023a, Citation2023b) by approaching the issue as an empirical question: specifically, to what extent ‘disapproval’ in real-world settings risks manifesting as stigmatization. In response, Vanyukov and Kirisci (Citation2024) reject this cautionary position, arguing instead for disapproval toward SUA to become a normative ‘consensus’. They further suggest that over-extending the concept of stigma, such that it encompasses ‘legitimate disapproval’, risks suppressing reasonable perspectives. We agree that it is essential to examine the distinction between norms and stigmatization, which we discuss below. However, we believe the original question – what does ‘beneficial disapproval’ look like in practice – remains unanswered.

Journal
Addiction Research & Theory

StatusEarly Online
Publication date online31/05/2025
Date accepted by journal19/05/2025
PublisherInforma UK Limited
ISSN1606-6359
eISSN1476-7392

People (1)

Dr James Nicholls

Dr James Nicholls

Senior Lecturer in Public Health, Health Sciences Stirling