Article
Details
Citation
Morris J & Nicholls J (2025) The complexity of stigma demands nuanced debate. Addiction Research & Theory. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2025.2509632
Abstract
First paragraph:
Morris et al. (Citation2024) respond to recent claims that societal disapproval may help reduce ‘substance use and addiction’ (SUA) (Vanyukov Citation2023a, Citation2023b) by approaching the issue as an empirical question: specifically, to what extent ‘disapproval’ in real-world settings risks manifesting as stigmatization. In response, Vanyukov and Kirisci (Citation2024) reject this cautionary position, arguing instead for disapproval toward SUA to become a normative ‘consensus’. They further suggest that over-extending the concept of stigma, such that it encompasses ‘legitimate disapproval’, risks suppressing reasonable perspectives. We agree that it is essential to examine the distinction between norms and stigmatization, which we discuss below. However, we believe the original question – what does ‘beneficial disapproval’ look like in practice – remains unanswered.
Journal
Addiction Research & Theory
Status | Early Online |
---|---|
Publication date online | 31/05/2025 |
Date accepted by journal | 19/05/2025 |
Publisher | Informa UK Limited |
ISSN | 1606-6359 |
eISSN | 1476-7392 |
People (1)
Senior Lecturer in Public Health, Health Sciences Stirling